InstructionSearch
Formative Tools

Reading: ST 2.0 Informational, Grade 7: Objective 2.A.4.g:
Formative Tools for Knowing What Students Know

DISCUSSION About the Protocol Used | Using this Tool

Only when teachers know where their students are in relation to the objectives they are responsible for do they have the information they need to inform instruction. To do that, teachers must

  • Identify characteristics of proficiency on an objective using a specific assignment/assessment
  • Diagnose student strengths and needs on the performance
  • Determine next instructional steps based on the diagnosis

The following discussion by a team of Maryland teachers models the process of defining proficiency, diagnosing student performance and deciding what they need to do next instructionally for their students.

Discussion Participants:

  • Lani Seikaly, facilitator
  • Mark Moody, process observer
photo of Carol Brannock
Carol Brannock
ILA
Elkton M.S.
Cecil County Public Schools
photo of Gretchen Brown
Gretchen Brown
Instructional Support Teacher
Perryville M.S.
Cecil County Public Schools
photo of Martin Haberl
Martin Haberl
ELA Instructional Coordinator

Cecil County Public Schools
photo of Natalie Husbands
Natalie Husbands
Instructional Support Teacher
Elkton M.S.
Cecil County Public Schools
photo of Brenda Leffew
Brenda Leffew
ELA Teacher
Cherry Hill M.S.
Cecil County Public Schools

Objective 2.A.4.g

Synthesize ideas from text
Clarification of Indicator and Objectives

Question

What additional relevant information could be added to the article, "Swimming with Sharks", that would be helpful to the reader to better understand the development of shark repellant? Explain using support from the text. (Acrobat)

Defining Proficiency on this Question

In the first part of this protocol, a team of teachers work through the process of reaching consensus on what the team believes constitutes a proficient response on a selected text and question. Only after we have agreed on what constitutes a proficient response are we able to diagnose student strengths and needs.

Diagnosing Student Strengths and Needs to Inform Instruction

Once proficiency has been defined, the team is ready to examine student performance against your proficiency criteria. Teachers must shift their mindset from a summative examination to a formative examination of student performance. In many cases teachers have spent a great deal of time sorting student responses (either by letter grades or by rubric scores) and virtually no time diagnosing what students know and still need to learn. It is the diagnostic information that will help teachers understand what they need to do next instructionally with their students.

In this part of the protocol, the team examines three student papers to determine if the response is proficient and to identify strengths, needs and instructional next steps.

Resources for Objective 2.A.4.g:
Lesson Seeds | FORMATIVE TOOLS |
 
Return