InstructionSearch
Formative Tools

Reading: ST 2.0 Informational, Grade 8: Objective 2.A.4.d:
Formative Tools for Knowing What Students Know

DISCUSSION About the Protocol Used | Using this Tool

Only when teachers know where their students are in relation to the objectives they are responsible for do they have the information they need to inform instruction. To do that, teachers must

  • Identify characteristics of proficiency on an objective using a specific assignment/assessment
  • Diagnose student strengths and needs on the performance
  • Determine next instructional steps based on the diagnosis

The following discussion by a team of Maryland teachers models the process of defining proficiency, diagnosing student performance and deciding what they need to do next instructionally for their students.

Discussion Participants:

  • Lani Seikaly, facilitator
  • Mark Moody, process observer
photo of Betsy Fecher
Betsy Fecher
ELA Teacher
Old Mill M.S. South
Anne Arundel County Public School
photo of Mark Lynch
Mark Lynch
Actg Coordinator

Anne Arundel County Public School
photo of Christina Patterson
Christina Patterson
ELA Teacher
Old Mill M.S. South
Anne Arundel County Public School
photo of Buffy Petrovick
Buffy Petrovick
MS Resource Teacher
Central Office
Anne Arundel County Public School
photo of Kathy Scholl
Kathy Scholl
MS Resource Teacher
Carver Staff Development Center
Anne Arundel County Public School

Objective 2.A.4.d

Summarize or paraphrase
Clarification of Indicator and Objectives

Question

Read the selection “Adventure’s Call” and then answer the following question.
Write a summary of the section of the article under the subheading “Call of the Sea.” Use information from the article to support your answer. (Acrobat)

Defining Proficiency on this Question

In the first part of this protocol, a team of teachers work through the process of reaching consensus on what the team believes constitutes a proficient response on a selected text and question. Only after we have agreed on what constitutes a proficient response are we able to diagnose student strengths and needs.

Diagnosing Student Strengths and Needs to Inform Instruction

Once proficiency has been defined, the team is ready to examine student performance against your proficiency criteria. Teachers must shift their mindset from a summative examination to a formative examination of student performance. In many cases teachers have spent a great deal of time sorting student responses (either by letter grades or by rubric scores) and virtually no time diagnosing what students know and still need to learn. It is the diagnostic information that will help teachers understand what they need to do next instructionally with their students.

In this part of the protocol, the team examines three student papers to determine if the response is proficient and to identify strengths, needs and instructional next steps.

Resources for Objective 2.A.4.d:
Lesson Seeds | FORMATIVE TOOLS |
 
Return